Visitors: 195341
Today: 62
Statistics

204 registered members

Latest member:
wwinter86

More statistics

Mini Poll
This year, you'll be investing in...












Results

Shoutbox

jimerickson: Congratulations rhavern!

rhavern: Quad G34s rock. Mine puts out ~600kPPD.

MarkAGR: Uh? Just woke up from my winter hibernation ... Good Morning everyone! I nearly made it 23m over the winter! I think there's a quad cpu G34 machine on it's way.

toTOW: Anyone alive ?

toTOW: Happy new year to all fellow folders :)

warmon6: Look like the web site needs an update or 2. starting to see cob webs. (could at least mention about bigadv change happening in Jan. ;)

toTOW: Recredit has ben run ... all points should show up now :)

toTOW: Stats are down since the last network outage :(

MarkAGR: OK, so there's a 16 core minimum ... so does anyone know how to produce a 16 core virtual machine from a cluster of ubuntu boxes?

MarkAGR: Where did all thw stats go?

jimerickson: Http://bit.ly/tkpFnJ

jimerickson: 16 core minimum for bigadv. wow!

Adanorm: Hi ! We just applied patches to the site, if shoutbox goes mad, just CTRL+F5 !

jimerickson: Http://bit.ly/okqvf7

jimerickson: Happily folding smp now. and currently earning 2000ppd more than with bigadv. go figure.

jimerickson: I detest p2684, after this one is finished i am moving to smp.

Amaruk: FahCore 11 (ATI) support is scheduled to end September 1st. http://en.fah-addict.net/news/news.php?id=352

hootis: >toTow I think i saw it somewhere either on the folding forum or here, but i cant remember. just wondering if any1 knew.

toTOW: Divery> yes, a little ... on an i7 920 @3.5 GHz (no GPU), I get something like 15k PPD with regular SMP and 22k on BigAdv ...

toTOW: Hootis> did we mention it in one of our news ? anyway I don't remember :(

divery4eyes: Am thinking of adding a couple of smp boxen. is big adv still preferable over regular smp.

hootis: Dose anyone know when the ATi Gpu2 clients are going to be phased out?

MarkAGR: Sniff sniff :(

KaySL: That might explain the weirdly low point yield I'm now getting...

jimerickson: Bigadv bonus reduced from 50% to 20%


Refresh

Archives

Social networks
Facebook
Twitter
Support
­

­

 
ATI Radeon logo It seems we were wrong when we announced in our recent news that the Radeon HD6000 would need a new client and core in order to fold.

Though we were wrong about the current client being incapable of folding with the cards, we were right that the performance would not be of the first order.

This has been confirmed by two users on the official forum, Tobit and mdk777. The current client (6.23) is perfectly capable of folding with AMD's new cards if one simply starts it up with the -forcegpu ati_r700 flag, just as one would with a Radeon HD5000.

Unfortunately, the performance figures are disappointing; the current core is unable to efficiently take advantage of these chips' additional calculation units.

mdk777 got 3,153 PPD (p5733) on his non-overclocked HD6850. With the fan speed manually set at 70%, he was able to keep the GPU at 50°C. The difference in power consumption between the card idling and folding was 115W.

For his part, Tobit experimented on a HD6870. He received 3,618 PPD, but unfortunately didn't provide any information on the operating temperature or power consumption of the card.

By way of comparison, we invite you to read (or re-read) Radeon HD5770 test.

Meanwhile, we'll just have to wait for the Radeon HD6900's release at the end of November, and the new OpenCL core, and hope to see some performance increase from the red side of the force.

Source: Official Forum



KaySL On: 11/03/10
GPU3 client reaches version 6.40r1; featuring Compute Capability support New uniprocessor projects: 10200-10205